Who should I lease my property to?

Selecting the right organisation to lease your property to is a critical decision. It can significantly influence your financial returns, property upkeep, and the quality of care provided to tenants.

Large registered providers—often known as "blue chip" housing associations—typically offer higher rent due to their funding models, where operational costs are reimbursed directly by the government. These providers may also offer planning benefits, such as facilitating C3B use in Article 4 areas, which removes the need for C4 planning permission. As previously discussed, higher return and perceived lease security can improve your chances of obtaining a solid lease-based valuation.
However, smaller providers are also active in the sector. These range from individuals to Community Interest Companies (CICs) that manage both housing and care. Recent regulatory scrutiny of private landlords offering care services highlights the need to ensure any provider has the appropriate experience and qualifications—particularly in the care sector.

Thorough vetting is essential for all providers, regardless of size.
Some smaller organisations, including CICs, have developed strong reputations for delivering high-quality care, maintaining financial sustainability, and managing properties responsibly. For investors prioritising quality care and tenant support over maximum financial return, a smaller but reputable provider may be the better choice.

Most leases require that the property be returned in its original condition, aside from “fair wear and tear.” If maintenance is not handled effectively during the lease term, deterioration can accelerate, leading to costly repairs. Poor property upkeep can also impact tenant relationships with care providers and compromise the overall standard of living. Some agreements restrict landlord access, which you may be uncomfortable with. Smaller providers may offer more flexible terms, if you would like occasional access to their property.

Before signing a lease, seek legal advice to review the contract terms. Additionally, visit existing properties managed by the provider to assess maintenance quality and care standards. In one case, visiting a house being sold by a major provider revealed significant maintenance issues and a reluctance to allow tenant interaction—both red flags for me.

In conclusion, each option has its trade-offs, and your choice should align with both your investment goals and values.

Previous
Previous

Rethinking Supported Living: When the Numbers Don’t Stack Up

Next
Next

The hurdles of financing supported accommodation projects and making sense of it all!